<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Clint Eastwood film &#8211; Blood Work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://piddleville.com/2008/07/23/another-clint-eastwood-film-blood-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://piddleville.com/2008/07/23/another-clint-eastwood-film-blood-work/</link>
	<description>Movies, classic movies, books and other blather</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:12:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://piddleville.com/2008/07/23/another-clint-eastwood-film-blood-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2592</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piddleville.com/?p=758#comment-2592</guid>
		<description>Nice review Bill. Although a major Eastwood fan Blood Work is one of the few Clint movies I still haven&#039;t seen. After reading your review I guess I will have to rectify that. Your review does bring up an interesting observation in the way that Eastwood&#039;s movies often play better than perhaps they did first time around. For instance, I read your negative review of Flags of Our Fathers &amp; whilst I felt that film had some minor problems - principally an overextended third act - rewatching it recently I was pleasantly surprised to find how well it played. The emotional restraint of the movie seemed entirely appropriate given its subject matter of the gulf between combat myth &amp; combat reality. It is an intellectual war movie not least in its non-linear storytelling which serves as an expression of the psychological state of the Iwo survivors &amp; provides a satisfying contrast with the more linear &amp; emotionally powerful Letters from Iwo Jima. But then I&#039;ve always felt that the two films go together. Both examine the same theme - what it is that countries demand of their troops. A culture that needs heroes in Flags is contrasted with one that demands death in Letters. But in both cases Eastwood&#039;s sympathies remain with the men regardless of which side they&#039;re on. Pretty darn impressive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice review Bill. Although a major Eastwood fan Blood Work is one of the few Clint movies I still haven&#8217;t seen. After reading your review I guess I will have to rectify that. Your review does bring up an interesting observation in the way that Eastwood&#8217;s movies often play better than perhaps they did first time around. For instance, I read your negative review of Flags of Our Fathers &amp; whilst I felt that film had some minor problems &#8211; principally an overextended third act &#8211; rewatching it recently I was pleasantly surprised to find how well it played. The emotional restraint of the movie seemed entirely appropriate given its subject matter of the gulf between combat myth &amp; combat reality. It is an intellectual war movie not least in its non-linear storytelling which serves as an expression of the psychological state of the Iwo survivors &amp; provides a satisfying contrast with the more linear &amp; emotionally powerful Letters from Iwo Jima. But then I&#8217;ve always felt that the two films go together. Both examine the same theme &#8211; what it is that countries demand of their troops. A culture that needs heroes in Flags is contrasted with one that demands death in Letters. But in both cases Eastwood&#8217;s sympathies remain with the men regardless of which side they&#8217;re on. Pretty darn impressive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
