<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hitchcock&#8217;s Vertigo and the litmus test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://piddleville.com/2009/07/01/hitchcocks-vertigo-and-the-litmus-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://piddleville.com/2009/07/01/hitchcocks-vertigo-and-the-litmus-test/</link>
	<description>Movies, classic movies, books and other blather</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:06:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://piddleville.com/2009/07/01/hitchcocks-vertigo-and-the-litmus-test/comment-page-1/#comment-28883</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piddleville.com/?p=1582#comment-28883</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never actually seen either The Golden Bowl or Guernica, so I can&#039;t comment on those. As for Vertigo, I always kind of liked it, but wasn&#039;t a huge fan. But this time when I watched it things seemed to click. I think part of its attraction, for critics at least, is what is perceived to be insight into Hitchcock and some of his obsessions/fetishes. Myself, part of the reason I watched it is because I&#039;m reading a biography of Jimmy Stewart and he, in his own way, is an interesting guy, though not in an obvious way. Of course, I also have always liked the fact it had Kim Novak. I think I thought she was &quot;hot&quot; when I was much younger. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never actually seen either The Golden Bowl or Guernica, so I can&#8217;t comment on those. As for Vertigo, I always kind of liked it, but wasn&#8217;t a huge fan. But this time when I watched it things seemed to click. I think part of its attraction, for critics at least, is what is perceived to be insight into Hitchcock and some of his obsessions/fetishes. Myself, part of the reason I watched it is because I&#8217;m reading a biography of Jimmy Stewart and he, in his own way, is an interesting guy, though not in an obvious way. Of course, I also have always liked the fact it had Kim Novak. I think I thought she was &#8220;hot&#8221; when I was much younger. <img src='http://piddleville.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: balbulican</title>
		<link>http://piddleville.com/2009/07/01/hitchcocks-vertigo-and-the-litmus-test/comment-page-1/#comment-28882</link>
		<dc:creator>balbulican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piddleville.com/?p=1582#comment-28882</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m embarassed to admit the Vertigo is one of those masterpieces I just don&#039;t get, like The Golden Bowl or Guernica. I&#039;m not a cultural illiterate, I like most Hitchcock (love strangers on a train, rear window, north by northwest): but Vertigo just eludes me. It seems silly and contrived. That&#039;s fine when there&#039;s a strong comic undertone to the film, as in north by northwest - but Vertigo takes itself SO seriously...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m embarassed to admit the Vertigo is one of those masterpieces I just don&#8217;t get, like The Golden Bowl or Guernica. I&#8217;m not a cultural illiterate, I like most Hitchcock (love strangers on a train, rear window, north by northwest): but Vertigo just eludes me. It seems silly and contrived. That&#8217;s fine when there&#8217;s a strong comic undertone to the film, as in north by northwest &#8211; but Vertigo takes itself SO seriously&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
