<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Piddleville</title>
	<atom:link href="http://piddleville.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://piddleville.com</link>
	<description>Musings about movies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 14:59:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Quiet Man (1952) by Familiarity and comfort movies &#124; Piddleville</title>
		<link>http://piddleville.com/reviews/the-quiet-man-1952/comment-page-1/#comment-60937</link>
		<dc:creator>Familiarity and comfort movies &#124; Piddleville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 14:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piddleville.com/reviews/the-quiet-man-1952/#comment-60937</guid>
		<description>[...] across in his later movies, like Hatari! or Donovan&#8217;s Reef, or even an earlier movie like The Quiet Man. Their merits as films aside, people watch to see the Duke and the actors/characters associated [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] across in his later movies, like Hatari! or Donovan&#8217;s Reef, or even an earlier movie like The Quiet Man. Their merits as films aside, people watch to see the Duke and the actors/characters associated [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Philadelphia Story (1940) by How one romantic comedy could have been fixed &#124; Piddleville</title>
		<link>http://piddleville.com/reviews/the-philadelphia-story-1940/comment-page-1/#comment-60936</link>
		<dc:creator>How one romantic comedy could have been fixed &#124; Piddleville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 14:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piddleville.com/reviews/the-philadelphia-story-1940/#comment-60936</guid>
		<description>[...] in the romantic relationships. Compare that to what you find in classic romantic comedies like The Philadelphia Story, When Harry Met Sally or The Shop Around the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the romantic relationships. Compare that to what you find in classic romantic comedies like The Philadelphia Story, When Harry Met Sally or The Shop Around the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Father Goose (1964) by Familiarity and comfort movies &#124; Piddleville</title>
		<link>http://piddleville.com/reviews/father-goose-1964/comment-page-1/#comment-60927</link>
		<dc:creator>Familiarity and comfort movies &#124; Piddleville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 22:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piddleville.com/?page_id=923#comment-60927</guid>
		<description>[...] Although it’s not the movie I’d like to start off with (it’s a bit misleading as far as what I consider a comfort movie to be), my favourite movie as far as this category goes is Father Goose. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Although it’s not the movie I’d like to start off with (it’s a bit misleading as far as what I consider a comfort movie to be), my favourite movie as far as this category goes is Father Goose. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Donovan’s Reef (1963) by Familiarity and comfort movies &#124; Piddleville</title>
		<link>http://piddleville.com/reviews/donovan%e2%80%99s-reef-1963/comment-page-1/#comment-60926</link>
		<dc:creator>Familiarity and comfort movies &#124; Piddleville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 22:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piddleville.com/?page_id=940#comment-60926</guid>
		<description>[...] particularly comes across in his later movies, like Hatari! or Donovan&#8217;s Reef, or even an earlier movie like The Quiet Man. Their merits as films aside, people watch to see the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] particularly comes across in his later movies, like Hatari! or Donovan&#8217;s Reef, or even an earlier movie like The Quiet Man. Their merits as films aside, people watch to see the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hereafter and the storytelling Clint Eastwood by Terry</title>
		<link>http://piddleville.com/2011/04/30/hereafter-and-the-storytelling-clint-eastwood/comment-page-1/#comment-60921</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 21:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piddleville.com/?p=4645#comment-60921</guid>
		<description>Hearafter is the worst movie Clint Eastwood ever directed, and the only plausible answe I can think of? The producers got in the way of the final outcome. 

The story never advances. 

The movie does not know whose story this is. 

The movie has no identity. 

1/2 star out of 5. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hearafter is the worst movie Clint Eastwood ever directed, and the only plausible answe I can think of? The producers got in the way of the final outcome. </p>
<p>The story never advances. </p>
<p>The movie does not know whose story this is. </p>
<p>The movie has no identity. </p>
<p>1/2 star out of 5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Arsenic and Old Lace (1944) by Jill hamlug</title>
		<link>http://piddleville.com/reviews/arsenic-and-old-lace-1944/comment-page-1/#comment-60915</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill hamlug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 03:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piddleville.com/?page_id=1713#comment-60915</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had no luck either  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had no luck either</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Arsenic and Old Lace (1944) by Emmafrank</title>
		<link>http://piddleville.com/reviews/arsenic-and-old-lace-1944/comment-page-1/#comment-60914</link>
		<dc:creator>Emmafrank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 03:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piddleville.com/?page_id=1713#comment-60914</guid>
		<description>i need the script for free does any one know where i can get it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i need the script for free does any one know where i can get it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Christmas in Connecticut (1945) by Bill Wren - Writelife</title>
		<link>http://piddleville.com/reviews/christmas-in-connecticut-1945/comment-page-1/#comment-60901</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Wren - Writelife</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 12:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piddleville.com/#comment-60901</guid>
		<description>Thanks for commenting. Yes, once that opening is over and Stanwyck enters it and the focus shifts to her, it becomes a good movie. You&#039;re right about channel surfers. The opening would prompt a lot of them to pass on the film and look for something else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for commenting. Yes, once that opening is over and Stanwyck enters it and the focus shifts to her, it becomes a good movie. You&#8217;re right about channel surfers. The opening would prompt a lot of them to pass on the film and look for something else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Christmas in Connecticut (1945) by Pocketsizedman</title>
		<link>http://piddleville.com/reviews/christmas-in-connecticut-1945/comment-page-1/#comment-60900</link>
		<dc:creator>Pocketsizedman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 23:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piddleville.com/#comment-60900</guid>
		<description>Just watched this last night and found the movie to be quite good once Stanwyck gets involved. Reginald Gardiner and Greenstreet are a lot of fun, poking fun at their appearances and mannerisms. Dennis Morgan is fine,  tied down with a stereotyped all-American  hero character. I agree; the opening sequences are terrible. Distracting music plays over a very uneven start that will get channel surfers clearing out fast. Too bad. For patient viewers, Stanwyck is very funny and displays great sexiness. There&#039;s very funny lines throughout. Worth a look but certainly no Holiday classic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just watched this last night and found the movie to be quite good once Stanwyck gets involved. Reginald Gardiner and Greenstreet are a lot of fun, poking fun at their appearances and mannerisms. Dennis Morgan is fine,  tied down with a stereotyped all-American  hero character. I agree; the opening sequences are terrible. Distracting music plays over a very uneven start that will get channel surfers clearing out fast. Too bad. For patient viewers, Stanwyck is very funny and displays great sexiness. There&#8217;s very funny lines throughout. Worth a look but certainly no Holiday classic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 3 Godfathers (1948) by Mshduke</title>
		<link>http://piddleville.com/reviews/3-godfathers-1948/comment-page-1/#comment-60893</link>
		<dc:creator>Mshduke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 20:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piddleville.com/?page_id=977#comment-60893</guid>
		<description>Go back to &#039;piddlin&#039;, cause as a critic, as the Duke might say, it &quot;don&#039;t fit your pistol&quot;. Contrary to your comment this is indeed a John Ford story. Ford was resplendent in his use of an apparently evil lead character finding some sort of redemption. Think of &quot;The Searchers&quot; and you will see what I mean. A Christmas Western is no more weird than a Beverly Hill&#039;s or New York Christmas. People did celebrate in the west albeit perhaps not within your approval rating. The story is basically a classic tale having been filmed numerous times. The symbolism of such things as the Christmas birth, New Jerusalem, 3 &#039;wise&#039; men, the Bible (specially when the wind whips it open to the passage about the donkey and then lo and behold one appears), and finally to the redemption of Wayne&#039;s character as he refuses a parole in return for relinquishing rights to his God-son and then receiving the well wishes of the citizens of Welcome. Just a downright great Christmas film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go back to &#8216;piddlin&#8217;, cause as a critic, as the Duke might say, it &#8220;don&#8217;t fit your pistol&#8221;. Contrary to your comment this is indeed a John Ford story. Ford was resplendent in his use of an apparently evil lead character finding some sort of redemption. Think of &#8220;The Searchers&#8221; and you will see what I mean. A Christmas Western is no more weird than a Beverly Hill&#8217;s or New York Christmas. People did celebrate in the west albeit perhaps not within your approval rating. The story is basically a classic tale having been filmed numerous times. The symbolism of such things as the Christmas birth, New Jerusalem, 3 &#8216;wise&#8217; men, the Bible (specially when the wind whips it open to the passage about the donkey and then lo and behold one appears), and finally to the redemption of Wayne&#8217;s character as he refuses a parole in return for relinquishing rights to his God-son and then receiving the well wishes of the citizens of Welcome. Just a downright great Christmas film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

