For the Love of Film (Noir): This Gun For Hire

Today the For the Love of Film (Noir) blogathon begins and I decided rather than burble about the genre, which can be as murky as the streets and lives its films tend to articulate, I’d post something about a specific noir, one that stars an actor who really hit his stride, as far as fame goes, with the genre and this particular movie, This Gun For Hire. The actor, of course, is Alan Ladd.

The blogathon runs thru to February 21st with the goal of raising money to restore a specific movie, The Sound of Fury (1950, aka Try and Get Me). I love the brief description on IMDb, “A man down on his luck falls in with a criminal. After a senseless murder, the two are lynched.” If you’re inclined to pitch in, please do. You can . And now, on with …

This Gun For Hire (1942)

Directed by Frank Tuttle

I came upon a review of This Gun For Hire that complained about it being viewed as film noir. The reviewer argued it was not; it was pulp. The first thing I thought was, “Aren’t all the best film noirs pulp?” My second thought was a sigh because film noir is so idiosyncratic in its definition. Everyone has their own idea of what it is.

For me, this movie is film noir. Regardless of whether it is or not, the important thing is it’s a wholly captivating movie, thanks largely to Alan Ladd’s portrayal of Raven.

Of course there is also some pretty brisk direction from Frank Tuttle and a good script.

Billing aside, this is Alan Ladd’s movie. He is the star. As good as they are, you could replace Robert Preston and Veronica Lake and not much would change. Replace Ladd and I suspect you would have a different movie and perhaps not as good.

Amid the murder and mayhem of the film, it is the story of Raven: what he does and why he does it. In other words, it’s about who he is. In the first few minutes, we see a man who uses a gun and, given the title, we infer it is for nothing good.

But we quickly see him with a cat and a moment of softening. He cares for the cat; there is tenderness. Raven then leaves the room and almost immediately we see a woman come in to tidy it. She shoos the cat away crossly and Raven steps back into the room.

Now we see what the gun is about. We see the Raven the world must deal with. He strikes the woman, tears her dress and forces her out of the room.

It is less what he does than it is how he does it: quick, brutal and unrepentant. The tenderness he has for cats is not extended to people. The opening, then, tells us what we need to know about the character. From here, the story’s engine kicks in. The opening is a great example of exposition. It provides essential information, and in a riveting way, so we can understand what is to follow.

What follows is standard pulp/film noir material. Raven is a hired killer. He does a job. Then he is shafted by the man who hired him. He’s paid with marked, stolen money. As soon as he spends some of it, the police are after him and he immediately recognizes what has happened. Now his goal is simple: kill the people who set him up. And he is nothing if not focused.

It is not that simple, however. There are complications. But this is the essential story: Raven on a mission to kill the people who set him up and how his character is revealed and alters in the process. Even the ostensible stars, Preston and Lake, are secondary to Ladd’s Raven. They are tools for revealing his character.

As with the similar (though not nearly as good) movie, Lucky Jordan, the complications involve the Second World War, selling vital material to the enemy, and patriotic pleas. Raven cares only for himself (as does Jordan) and it’s the role of Lake to persuade him to see the larger picture and care for the country which means other people.

What she is up against is a man whose background was as brutal as he has become and that has defined him and how he sees the world. The world he now inhabits confirms his view. Yet we know there is something human in him from how he relates to cats and we understand later in the film why he is as he is in a scene where he describes his childhood. Despite his callousness and violence, we care about him.

Although he was in countless movies prior to this one, This Gun For Hire was the first time Alan Ladd starred in a movie, although he was sitting in the back row as far as the billing went. I can understand why he hadn’t been noticed prior to this though. From the few movies I’ve seen him in, Ladd seems one of the quietest, most understated actors I’ve seen. Few actors express anger and melancholy as well as he does or as naturally.

Frank Tuttle, a kind of journeyman director who cranked out movies for the studio, excels here, perhaps because of the script, perhaps because of the work of cinematographer John F. Seitz, or maybe because he was a meat and potatoes director. The movie is simply and quickly directed and that is one of its virtues.

Call it a crime film, call it pulp, call it what you will, to me this is a great example of noir and regardless of genre a thoroughly compelling movie. As you may have guessed, I liked it a lot.

11 Responses

  1. Pingback: Ferdy on Films
  2. says:

    I can’t believe I had this post up for over an hour with a typo calling it “The Gun For Hire” not “This Gun For Hire.” As often happens, the eyes see what they want to …

  3. I love This Gun for Hire and agree that this is a noir film and that Ladd gives one of his best, most iconic performances. I also have a lot of respect for Tuttle, who turned in a great many solid silent films. Thanks for supporting our blogathon!

  4. says:

    Thank you and the Siren for getting the blogathon going. I think it’s a great idea. It was nice that it seems to have coincided with my own sudden interest in noir. By the way, I’ve become quite curious about Frank Tuttle. I’d love to read a biography of him since he strikes me as a good example of the average director (if there is such a thing) – not a Howard Hawks or John Ford, just a working director. (Well, until the McCarthy period.)

    It’s a little early, but when this roles around next year I love it if there was a screwball comedy that needed saving. I love screwball comedies.

  5. Tinky says:

    Who knew there were people who quibbled about pulp versus noir? Nice analysis.

    Screwall comedies–what a great idea! That’s my genre.

  6. says:

    Thanks for stopping by and commenting. Yes, screwball is my first love. I can’t get enough of it. By the way, I have to go back to your post and read through it properly but I love the Film Noir Torte! I think I would have a Spanish Coffee with it, though I’m not sure how nor-ish that aspect would be. :)

  7. Bill: Thanks for writing about an interesting movie. I think this was one of the first cases, where I learned a movie had been based on a book and I went out and sought the book, Graham Greene’s “A Gun for Sale.” As always, they changed a lot in making the movie, but I like the movie’s title better.

  8. says:

    I had forgotten that it was based on Greene’s book. He’s a favourite writer of mine. Quite a few movies have been based on his books. He also wrote screenplays, like the very well known The Third Man. Thanks for stopping by!

  9. 1hhh1 says:

    This Gun for Hire is not a noire,it’s not rated as that by Nino Franks

  10. SBOBET says:

    Not simple video trailer?

  11. please give me some download player for this video !

Leave a Reply